Implementasi Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Berbasis Model Nested untuk Meningkatkan Respon Belajar Mahasiswa UNIPDU Jombang
Keywords:
Implemetasi Pembelajaran IPA, Model Pembelajaran Terpadu, Nested Model, Respon Belajar, Mahasiswa PGMI UNIPDU, JombangAbstract
This study was aimed to description the implementation of Science integrated learning with Nested Model to increase student responses in PGMI. Students of 3th semester majoring in PGMI, Unipdu, Jombang, were subjected with the tested learning method. The study was conducted in September-November 2017 with experimental method. Students’ performance was assesed through cognitive tests, observation, and interviews. Results of this study indicate that Science integrated learning with Nested Model to improve students responses. Student responses to Science integrated learning with Nested Model is positive.
References
Ayas, M.B. & Sak, U. (2014). Objective measure of scientific creativity: Psychometricvalidity of the creative scientific ability test. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 195–205.
Fogarty, R. 2009. How to Integrate the Curricula 3rd Ed. Corwin: Sage Company
Fraenkel, Jack R., (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education 7th. McGraw Hill Companies, Inc: New York.
Fraenkel, Jack R., (2014). How to design and evaluate research in education 7th. McGraw Hill Companies, Inc: New York.
Hamalik, Oemar. (2008). Dasar-dasar Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Hu, W. and Adey, P. (2010). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24:4, 389-403.
Hu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C. and Meyer, W. (2013). Increasing student’s scientific creativity: The “learn to think†intervention program.The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47:1, 3–21.
Ibrahim, M. (2012). Pembelajaran berdasarkan masalah (PBM). Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
Laughlin, M,C., William, C., Thompson, M. and Zike, D. (2005). Physical Science. Washington, D.C: Glencoe Science.
Majid, Abdul. (2014.) Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mudzakir, Ahmad. (2012). The Meaning of Science and Integrated Science, and Historical Development of Integrated Science. UPI Bandung
Mukhopadhyay R. and Sen, M.K. (2012). Investigation of creativity in physics in the context of learning in association with deep approach to study. Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 4:2, 24-30.
Nur, M. (2000). Strategi – Strategi Belajar. Surabaya: Unipres
Nur, M. (2011). Model pembelajaran berdasarkan masalah. Surabaya: Pusat Sains dan Matematikan Sekolah Unesa.
Putra, M. I. S. (2014). Pembelajaran Terpadu Model Nested (Chapter Report: How to Integrate the Curricula 3rd Ed., R. Fogarty). Makalah. Tidak dipublikasikan. https://www.academia.edu/7814295/1_137966006_miftakhul_ilmi. Diakses tanggal 20 Juni 2017.
Putra, M.I.S, Wahono, W., and Jatmiko, B. (2016). The Development of Guided Inquiry Science Learning Materials to Improve Science literacy Skill of Prospective MI Teachers. Jurnal Pendidik IPA Indonesia (JPII). Vol. 5 No. 1, April 2016, pp. 83-93.
Santrock, J. W. (2014). Educational Psychlogy; 5th Edition. New York: McGrill.
Suryabrata, Sumadi.(2003). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo
Trianto (2012) Model Pembelajaran Terpadu Konsep, Strategi, dan Implementasinya dalam kurikulum Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP).. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
Wang, J. & Yu, J. (2011). Scientific creativity research based on generalizability theory and BP_Adaboost RT. Procedia Engineering, 15, 4178 – 4182.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All rights reserved.
this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording. Consequently, form this copyright notice, the author(s) have copyright for this publication.