Respon Peserta Didik dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Taksonomi SOLO (Structure of Observed Learning Outcome)

Anisa Fitri; Naning  Kurniawati; Zaki  Mubaroh

doi:10.36815/majamath.v4i2.1099

Authors

Anisa Fitri UNU Sunan Giri Bojonegoro
Naning Kurniawati UNU Sunan Giri Bojonegoro
Zaki Mubaroh UNU Sunan Giri Bojonegoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36815/majamath.v4i2.1099

Keywords:

Respons, Problem Solving, SOLO taxonomy

Abstract

In mathematics learning cannot be separated from problems. A problem in mathematics is defined as a problem that does not have a routine procedure to do it. A student will consider a question to be a problem if students have difficulty finding solutions to problems or questions using the knowledge they have. One way to identify the appropriateness of student responses to math problems or problems is the SOLO taxonomy (Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes). SOLO taxonomy is used to measure the quality of students 'answers to a problem based on the complexity of students' understanding or answers to a given problem. This study discusses student responses to math problems. Not only that, this study also discusses how to describe the structure of cognitive complexity or student responses from existing levels based on five stages, namely Prestructural, Unistructural, Multistructural, Relational, and Extended Abstract. The results of the study concluded that each student has a different problem solving response. Overall subject 1 can solve problem solving problems at the multistuctural level. Furthermore, subject 2 can solve problem solving problems at Unistrustural level. Then the latter, the subject cannot solve the problem solving as a whole so that it is at the Prestuctural level. This condition is the goal of this study, where by knowing the student's response to solving math problems, steps can be taken for the success of the learning process.

References

Afriyani, Dona., Cholis Sa’dijah., Subanji Subanji., Makbul Muksar. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2018 - Volume 13 Issue 3, pp. 281-287.

Biggs, J. B.; Collis, K.F. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: the SOLO Taxonomy; Academic Press: New York.

Branca, N. A. (2013) ‘Mathematical problem solving: Lessons from the british experience’, in Teaching and Learning Mathematical Problem Solving: Multiple Research Perspectives.

Hayuhantika, Diesty. 2016. Jurnal Pendidikan dan pembelajaran Matematika (JP2M). Vol.02.No.02. ISSN.2460-7800: 92-105.

Hobri et al. (2020) ‘The effect of jumping task based on creative problem solving on students’ problem solving ability’, International Journal of Instruction, 13(1). doi: 10.29333/iji.2020.13126a.

Hudojo, H. 2005. PengembanganKurikulumdanPembelajaranMatematika. Malang: UM Press.

Jäder, J., Lithner, J. and Sidenvall, J. (2020) ‘Mathematical problem solving in textbooks from twelve countries’, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(7). doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2019.1656826.

Lexy J. Moleong. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

NCTM, Principles and Standard for School Mathematics, (USA: Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, 2000), hal. 256

Solso. R. Robert, Maclin. H. Otto, Maclin. Kimberly. M. 2007. Psikologi Kognitif. Terjemahan Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta:Erlangga.

Sukmadinata, N.S. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Zaelani, K. M., Marlina, R. and Effendi, K. N. S. (2020) ‘The Algebraic Thinking Profile of Junior High School Students at Extended Abstract Level of SOLO Taxonomy’, Edumatika?: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2). doi: 10.32939/ejrpm.v3i2.599.